THE PATENTS ACT, 1970 | ||||
CHAPTER XVIII | ||||
SUITS CONCERNING INFRINGEMENT OF PATENTS | ||||
Section 104 | ||||
Jurisdiction |
||||
No suit for a declaration under section 105 or for any relief under section 106 or for infringement of a patent shall be instituted in any court inferior to a district court having jurisdiction to try the suit: |
||||
Section 104A | ||||
Burden of proof in case of suits concerning infringement |
||||
(1) In any suit for infringement of a patent, where the subject matter of patent is a process for obtaining a product, the court may direct the defendant to prove that the process used by him to obtain the product, identical to the product of the patented process, is different from the patented process if,— (a)the subject matter of the patent is a process for obtaining a new product; or (b)there is a substantial likelihood that the identical product is made by the process, and the patentee or a person deriving title or interest in the patent from him, has been unable throughreasonable efforts to determine the process actually used: Provided that the patentee or a person deriving title or interest in the patent from him first proves that the product is identical to the product directly obtained by the patented process.(2) In considering whether a party has discharged the burden imposed upon him by sub-section (1), the court shall not require him to disclose any manufacturing or commercial secrets, if it appears to the court that it would be unreasonable to do so. |
||||